Relationship

May 032013
 

A large, national study has found that people are better off not having a spouse than having poor relationship with one.Husband and wife do not find mutual understanding

The mantra that quality is more important than quantity is true when considering how social relationships influence depression, say U-M researchers in a new study.

After analyzing data from nearly 5,000 American adults, the researchers found that the quality of a person’s relationships with a spouse, family and friends predicted the likelihood of major depression disorder in the future, regardless of how frequently their social interactions took place.

Individuals with strained and unsupportive spouses were significantly more likely to develop depression, whereas those without a spouse were at no increased risk. And those with the lowest quality relationships had more than double the risk of depression than those with the best relationships.

The study, which was published online today in PLOS ONE, assessed the quality of social relationships on depression over a 10-year period, and is one of the first to examine the issue in a large, broad population over such a long time period.

Nearly 16 percent of Americans experience major depression disorder at some point in their lives, and the condition can increase the risk for and worsen conditions like coronary artery disease, stroke and cancer.

“Our study shows that the quality of social relationships is a significant risk factor for major depression,” says psychiatrist Alan Teo, M.D., M.S., a Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholar at U-M and the study’s lead author. “This is the first time that a study has identified this link in the general population.”

Digging deeper into the results, the researchers found that certain positive and negative aspects of relationships also predicted depression. Social strain and a lack of support – especially in spousal relationships and to some extent with family members – were both risk factors for developing depression later.

“These results tell us that health care providers need to remember that patients’ relationships with their loved ones likely play a central role in their medical care,” Teo says. “They also suggest that the broader use of couples therapy might be considered, both as a treatment for depression and as a preventative measure.”

While the results confirmed the researchers’ assumptions about relationship quality, they did not find a correlation between the frequency of social interactions and the prevalence of depression as predicted. Even if participants were socially isolated, having few interactions with family and friends, it did not predict depression risk. Teo says this finding should also translate to mental health treatment considerations.

“Asking a patient how she rates her relationship with her husband, rather than simply asking whether she has one, should be a priority,” Teo says.

The researchers say that the study’s significant effect size – one in seven adults with the lowest-quality relationships will develop depression, as opposed to just one in 15 with the highest quality relationships – indicates the potential for substantial change in the general population.

“The magnitude of these results is similar to the well-established relationship between biological risk factors and cardiovascular disease,” Teo says. “What that means is that if we can teach people how to improve the quality of their relationships, we may be able to prevent or reduce the devastating effects of clinical depression.”

Source: University of Michigan Health System

Mar 062013
 

The research shows there are costs that come with stigmatizing and rejecting others. And it may shed light on other types of social and physical harm, such as compliance in inflicting harm within military or police situations. Ultimately, the research underscores humans’ fundamental nature as social creatures. “Our results highlight that it goes against the grain of people’s psychological needs to exclude others,” says researcher Richard Ryan.

Mar 062013
 

Marriage may not always be as beneficial to health as experts have led us to believe, according to a new study. Researchers made two discoveries that explain why: First, marriage provides less protection against mortality as health deteriorates, even though it does seem to benefit those who are in excellent health. Secondly, married people tend to overestimate how healthy they are, compared to others. “These results suggest that marriage may be important for the prevention of disease, but not as helpful once people become seriously ill,” Zheng said.

Feb 142013
 

Research shows that married people have better mental and physical health than their unmarried peers and are less likely to develop chronic conditions than their widowed or divorced counterparts. A University of Missouri expert says that people who have happy marriages are more likely to rate their health as better as they age; aging adults whose physical health is declining could especially benefit from improving their marriages.

Feb 132013
 

People like to believe that their way of life — whether single or coupled — is the best for everyone, especially if they think their relationship status is unlikely to change, according to a study forthcoming in Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science. The study suggests that this bias may influence how we treat others, even in situations where relationship status shouldn’t matter.

  • RSSRSS
  • Social Slider
  • RSS